"Our continued disciplinary emphasis on
static text, and our reliance on theories derived from print texts, as Brooke and
Prior and Hengst (2010) note, not only puts us out of step with students and the
larger culture, but also blinds us to many of the rhetorical affordances of new
media." (p. 11)
- Here in the introduction and mostly throughout the whole introduction, Buck uses outside sources and theories that she is basing her research on. That is a good idea to show the reader other points of view about the topic, before she goes on through the paper with her views and the data she collected. This also could be away to tie the conclusion back to the introduction with the same outside sources.
"In focusing on social network sites, I use boyd and Ellison’s (2007) definition:
“web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public
profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they
share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those
made by others within the system”" (p. 11)
- Also in the introduction Buck told us some guidelines that she used for this experiment. I think that she did this in the last paragraph to kind of transition into her methods section of her paper.
Methods:
"Ronnie’s case study is part of a larger study of undergraduate and graduate stu-
dents’ literacy practices on social network sites. The undergraduate students in this
study, attending a large, Midwestern research university, were recruited during the
Spring 2010 semester by class visits to an advanced composition course focused
on composition through a variety of media, including image, audio, and video." (p.12)
- Buck breaks up her method section for each different way she collected data and how she got started in Ronnie's case study. The specific quote tells the reader how she chose a person to do the research one and it also tells us that this is not her own study and it's actually part of a bigger study on the campus.
"The
research interviews, for example, allowed me to gauge my own interpretations
of comments Ronnie posted online, as well as to gain background information
unavailable in the textual activity I recorded." (p. 13)
- This quote tells us a little bit on how the different resources she had available helped her in understanding his social media better than just looking at his profiles. I think its important to show the different ways you got information of course, but also how they helped in furthering your understanding of the case.
Results:
"For him, this number indexed his identity as
a producer rather than a consumer on Twitter:
I try to keep my followers greater than the number of people I’m following because, you know, it’s just like my, I guess, weird habit. All the big people who tweet have—tend to have—more followers than people they’re following, so I feel like in a way that I am a publisher and not just someone who’s following people. " (p. 14)
I try to keep my followers greater than the number of people I’m following because, you know, it’s just like my, I guess, weird habit. All the big people who tweet have—tend to have—more followers than people they’re following, so I feel like in a way that I am a publisher and not just someone who’s following people. " (p. 14)
- I like that throughout her results section Buck uses quotes from Ronnie to explain points that she is writing about his social media. That way the reader can see his view on things and might clear up some confusion that the reader might have.
"At the top of his Facebook
page, Ronnie had his name written in Chinese characters next to the Roman script.
Aside from a large photo album devoted to his music group’s trip to China and
Korea, however, Ronnie did not represent his ethnic heritage (either Chinese or
Irish) in his social network site use." (p.18)
- This is really interesting to me. She knows a little more about Ronnie than we know about our partners, but in her results instead of just putting things she noticed he did do on his social media, she also put in her results section stuff that she notice he didn't do on his social media.
Discussion:
"Because Ronnie used social network sites to organize different aspects of his life,
he was particularly attuned to the different ways in which his information was
dispersed and used, and this was a process that he wanted to have control over." (p. 31)
- I really like this quote because it shows that from her data she collected for two semesters and how she summarizes her results section, yet expands on the meaning behind the results she came to find.
"Ronnie also adjusted templates on social network sites for his own purposes." (p. 33)
- I think this quote from Buck really fits well in her discussion section. She states that Ronnie is taking the way he presents himself online into his own hands. Also this is showing that he wants to create his own way of showing who he is and taking charge.
Conclusion:
"Ronnie represents a rather extreme case of social network site use, both through
the number of sites he used and the amount of activity he engaged in on each site." (p. 34)
- This quote from Buck explains Ronnie is not a normal case and how comparing him to the norm or generalized idea, he is very different that the "average user."
"Rather than focusing only on the ways that social
network sites might be used in the classroom, considering the ways students inte-
grate the use of such sites into their daily lives can help researchers and teachers
better understand students’ writing activities and digital literacy practices within
digital environments." (p. 36)
- This is Buck's last sentence in her conclusion. She wraps up her whole paper and her thesis in one sentence at the end. This is were I struggle and need to work on is wrapping up my thoughts and not leaving anything hanging or loose.